You'll see on the post that I made a week ago, I reported that some of the traffic lights at Vauxhall would be re-phased so that pedestrian crossing times would be reduced. This is a general concern because Vauxhall is not the safest or easiest place to cross the road, even with current phasings.
I then wrote to both Caroline Pidgeon and Valerie Shawcross. Both responded quickly.
It appears that Caroline Pidgeon asked Boris Johnson whether London Boroughs would be consulted on the traffic light re-phasings back in March, and she specifically asked, "what will happen if boroughs object to a reduction in crossing times for pedestrians?". Boris responded by saying, "TfL has a statutory duty under the GLA Act to consult with the relevant borough officers before and after signal timings are changed and they always adhere to this".
Consequently, I wrote to ask the councillors whether the borough officers would consult the community. It appears, however, from my response from Caroline Pidgeon, that Boris' answer was incorrect re. the consultation of the Borough officers.
Caroline's answer is as follows:
"TfL does not (contrary to the Mayor’s statement) have a duty to consult on signals timings changes on their network (however signals timings must be within the limits set by DfT guidance).
If however TfL decides (voluntarily) to consult Lambeth it would be with our Traffic Manager (Thuraippah Sivalingam)."
So, effectively, TfL can rephase the lights without being statutorily required to consult the boroughs. There is no way for local residents to object.
It's all a teensy weensy bit totalitarian for my liking.
Beefeater Gin appoints Amplify PR for London visitor centre | PR Week - Beefeater Gin appoints Amplify PR for London visitor centre | PR Week ... traditional PR, experiential and digital aspects as part of a fully integrated ca...
3 hours ago