tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5614832110829270140.post7095442940653678928..comments2024-01-11T17:05:24.759+00:00Comments on Lurking about SE11: 81 Black Prince road appealSE11 Lurkerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01727961781290615066noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5614832110829270140.post-43470939785493604682009-05-01T17:09:00.000+01:002009-05-01T17:09:00.000+01:00I would advise anyone living around Vauxhall Walk ...I would advise anyone living around Vauxhall Walk and Black Prince road to appeal against this development. The appeal reference is APP/N5660/A/09/2101423 and it can be done online as stated above.<br /><br />I have searched the web for details of the developers Ristoia Ltd who are making this planning application and must admit that I've drawn a blank apart from the fact that they're registered in Ireland.<br /><br />However, I discovered this little gem on the web from the minutes of London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority:<br /><br />2. In addition there is a planning application which appears to be receiving favourable consideration by LBL for A site located at 81 Black Prince Road, the outcome of which may influence the 8 Albert Embankment proposals. If this application is approved it could lend additional weight to NL’s arguments for building height in the ‘viewing corridor’ and the amount of affordable housing. The determination of this application is expected in April this year.<br />I could only assume after reading these documents that compliance with Lambeth Council’s Planning procedures is not considered to be important or mandatory by developers and it may be up to Westminster Council to apply pressure for the World Heritage Site to be respected.<br /><br />The question is: Is this planning application merely a decoy for worst to come at the London Fire Service Headquarters building behind the listed Doulton building?<br /><br />NL = Native Land and these guys do have a few bob and a heavy weight portfolio of properties on the Southbank.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03670233279952666852noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5614832110829270140.post-81628903659889869312009-04-30T14:52:00.000+01:002009-04-30T14:52:00.000+01:00You're correct, the proposal is in SE1 (mostly bec...You're correct, the proposal is in SE1 (mostly because SE1 is a very peculiar shape, and includes the river front). <br /><br />However, it would affect mostly SE11 residents were it erected (not to mention people would north of the river that would over look it). <br /><br />I've amended the blog to read accordingly, and will happily flag up anything on SE1/SE11 boundaries.SE11 Lurkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14883634895974771036noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5614832110829270140.post-32194829816871185242009-04-30T14:42:00.000+01:002009-04-30T14:42:00.000+01:00This one's technically just in SE1 - we've got ano...This one's technically just in SE1 - we've got another picture here:<br />http://www.london-se1.co.uk/news/view/3742<br /><br />I'd missed the fact that they'd appealed - thanks for flagging it up.Jameshttp://www.london-se1.co.uknoreply@blogger.com